Decision intelligence for early-stage SaaS founders who have the data but struggle to make strategic decisions off the back of it. Not more dashboards. Not more reports. Decision clarity.
Behavioural data analysis + AI-assisted pattern detection
The Problem
You have the metrics. You have the tools. But when a strategic decision lands on the table — where to invest, what to cut, which feature to kill, which channel to scale — the data sits there, inert. The gap is not information. The gap is interpretation, prioritisation, and the confidence to act.
The Framework
A structured methodology that converts behavioural and operational data into ranked, actionable decisions.
Behavioural, growth, revenue, and operational data — collected and structured for analysis. We identify which signals are meaningful before touching a single metric.
Structured frameworks — Pareto analysis, cohort breakdowns, constraint mapping — applied to separate noise from signal. AI-assisted pattern detection surfaces what human review alone would miss.
A proprietary prioritisation model that scores each opportunity by effort, expected impact, risk profile, and time-to-value. No guesswork. Every recommendation is ranked.
Clear, unambiguous next actions. Every item is categorised: scale it, optimise it, experiment with it, or kill it. You leave with a decision, not a suggestion.
Step 03 — Defined
Every decision is scored 1–10 using four weighted dimensions. The composite score determines priority and the recommended action.
Scoring Dimensions
Impact
How much will this move the needle? Revenue, retention, activation, or growth effect measured against current baselines.
Effort
Dev time, operational complexity, resource cost. Lower effort at equal impact scores higher.
Risk
Downside if this fails. Reversibility, dependency chains, blast radius on existing users or revenue.
Time-to-Value
How quickly will results be measurable? Days score higher than months. Fast feedback loops reduce compounding risk.
Score → Action Mapping
Execute Now
High confidence. Proven signal. Scale or kill immediately.
Optimise
Working but not fully validated. Refine before committing more resources.
Experiment
Promising signal but unvalidated. Run a controlled test before scaling.
Deprioritise
Low impact, high effort, or high risk. Reallocate resources elsewhere.
Note: The score measures decision confidence and expected ROI — not the action type. A "Kill" decision can score 9.2 (high confidence that cutting a feature will improve outcomes). The category describes what to do. The score describes how certain you should be doing it.
How AI Fits In
AI is not the product. It is an instrument within the process — used to detect patterns at speed and scale that manual analysis cannot match.
Anomaly Detection
Surfaces unusual patterns in user behaviour, revenue spikes, or operational drift that would take weeks to find manually.
Cohort Segmentation
Groups users and accounts by behavioural similarity to identify which segments drive value — and which drain it.
Scenario Modelling
Runs decision scenarios against historical data to estimate outcomes, risk profiles, and second-order effects.
Decision Tool
Before optimising pricing, you need to know where you sit. This matrix plots your market penetration against monetisation intensity to determine the right strategic playbook.
Grow First
Keep ARPA low. Focus on acquisition volume. Learn what users value before optimising price.
Optimise / Scale
Traction + monetisation working. Retain and expand. This is where you want to be.
Pivot Needed
Low users, low ARPA. This is a product-market fit problem, not a pricing problem.
Premium / Enterprise
Few customers, high ARPA. Viable if intentional. Requires high-touch sales.
How we use this: During Signal Collection (Step 01), we plot your current position using customer count as a market penetration proxy and ARPA as a monetisation proxy. Your zone determines whether the framework focuses on acquisition, pricing optimisation, PMF fundamentals, or enterprise positioning. The matrix feeds directly into Opportunity Scoring.
Live Case Study
Threadly is our own SaaS product — and the live proving ground for the AdvancedData framework. Every strategic decision we make on Threadly is documented, measured, and published.
Most consultants advise from theory. We build and operate a real SaaS product, face the same constraints you do, and apply the exact framework we bring to client engagements. Threadly is where the methodology is stress-tested in real SaaS conditions.
Every decision — from feature prioritisation to pricing changes to growth channel allocation — runs through Signal Collection, Interpretation, Opportunity Scoring, and a Decision Roadmap. The outcomes are tracked and shared transparently.
Framework in Action
Signal Detected
Power users concentrated in a single workflow — 80% of engagement from 23% of features.
Interpretation
Pareto distribution confirmed. Non-core features diluting development velocity with negligible retention impact.
Opportunity Score
Consolidate core workflow: High impact, low effort, immediate time-to-value. Score: 9.2/10.
Decision
Kill 4 peripheral features. Scale core workflow. Reallocate 60% of dev capacity.
Real strategic decisions made on threadly.live using the AdvancedData framework. Every signal, every score, every outcome — documented publicly.
Pareto analysis showed 80% of engagement concentrated in 23% of features. We cut four peripheral features, reallocated dev capacity to the core workflow, and saw activation rates climb within two weeks.
Opportunity Score
High impact, low effort
Cohort analysis revealed new users who completed a specific action within the first session retained at 3x the rate. We restructured onboarding to guide users to that action first. Activation jumped from 22% to 34% in 30 days.
Opportunity Score
High impact, medium effort
Revenue data showed a bimodal distribution — light users on the Pro plan and power users on the same plan paying the same amount. We ran a controlled experiment with usage-based pricing on a 15% cohort to test willingness to pay at scale.
Opportunity Score
High impact, high effort
New decision entries are published monthly. Each post documents the full framework process — from signal detection through to measured outcome.
Want these in your inbox? Email advanceddata7@gmail.com with subject "Live Lab" and we will add you to the list.
Engagement
Each engagement applies the full framework. The difference is depth, scope, and ongoing involvement.
Decision Session
£1,500
A focused 90-minute session on one strategic decision. You bring the product data and context, we apply the framework, you leave with a ranked recommendation and written summary within 48 hours.
Strategic Sprint
From £7,500
A 2–4 week sprint across multiple decisions. Full product and growth data audit, behavioural analysis, opportunity scoring, and a prioritised decision roadmap covering your most critical SaaS strategy questions.
Ongoing Advisory
£3,500/month
Monthly decision intelligence embedded in your SaaS operations. Regular signal reviews, continuous opportunity scoring, and a standing advisory relationship as your product scales.
4-Step
Proprietary Framework
AI+
Pattern Detection Layer
Live
Case Study (Threadly)
48h
Decision Brief Turnaround
Start Here
Whether it is a single strategic question or a full product and growth audit, the process starts with a conversation. No pitch. No pressure. Tell us what you are facing and we will tell you whether the framework fits.
Built for SaaS founders who are:
Direct email: advanceddata7@gmail.com